Two special relationships between AIDS and homosexuality

First of all, regardless of homosexuality and heterosexuality, the following four principles are worth keeping in mind!

1. Every sexual object must be regarded as infected and insist on using a condom every time you insert sex.

2. Condoms can be avoided only if the two people are very clear that they are the only sex object for each other, and it has been more than 3 months since the last time they had sex with someone else, and both HIV tests were negative.

3. If you are of the same sex, apply a sufficient amount of lubricant on the penis before putting on the condom, and then use sufficient amount of lubricant on the outside of the condom. At the same time, the inserted party should apply the lubricant in the anus with your fingers. The use of lubricants has two main purposes, one is to prevent condoms from breaking, and the other is to increase pleasure.

4. Sexually active people (with multiple sexual partners) should be tested for HIV every six months, even if they use condoms correctly every time.

For most members of Chinese society, homosexuality is a shameful but well-known phenomenon that is less suitable for discussion. When most people talk about it, they may feel an inexplicable embarrassment and an indescribable tension. Quickly turn to another topic. In the eyes of the public, homosexuality It is always associated with the concepts of "abnormal", "faulty" and "immoral". However, this is not the case.

First of all vibrator for women , let's think about these often thrown words and the concepts they represent-"normal" and "abnormal", "disease" and "health", "moral" and "immoral". A fundamental question is, how to determine the boundaries of these opposing concepts? In terms of "normal" and "abnormal", there is no doubt that at the level of the problem we are discussing, "abnormal" refers to a behavior and way of life that is different from that of most people, so how many people have to share behavior? to be considered "normal"? What percentage of the total population is needed?

More importantly, here "abnormal" ("different from ordinary people") is marked with a moral mark, in other words, whether "normal" is directly related to "correct". Especially because when it comes to sex vibrators for women , the correctness or incorrectness of sex is a serious moral problem in China. Under this logic, homosexuality is regarded as immoral behavior.

However, why does a natural sexual behavior face such moral embarrassment? Looking at today's world, diversity and differentiation are becoming a great driving force for the development of our society, and it is difficult to understand why people's attitudes are so backward on the issue of homosexuality. Not to mention, a large number of behavioral and neuroscientific evidence has long been found that homosexuality is one of the normal sexual tendencies of human beings and even animals. Homosexuality is not a way of life that people choose at will, but a natural behavior formed by nature.



The reason why homosexuality has become the target of discrimination and accusation by many people in today's society is that many people think that they should be responsible for AIDS. They think that in this group, AIDS began to break out and spread. But is it really their "abnormal" behavior that led to the rapid spread of this terrible disease? This statement seems reasonable, but in fact it does not come from the facts. Although AIDS was first discovered in the gay community in the United States when it was first discovered by the Western medical community, in fact, from a world point of view, the spread between the opposite sex occupies the first place. The same is true in China at present. The Ministry of Health pointed out in the "China Joint Assessment report on AIDS Prevention and Control (2007)" issued on November 29, 2007: "in 2007. Of the 50,000 new infections, heterosexual transmission accounted for 44.7%, male-to-male transmission accounted for 12.2%, injecting drug use accounted for 42%, and mother-to-child transmission accounted for 1.1%. "

This is in sharp contrast to the common views in the media and the misunderstandings of many people in society. The results of this assessment show that although male-to-male transmission is a very important way, it is not the primary route at present, and heterosexual sex causes far more infections than male transmission.

In two words, homosexuality, especially gay men, is one of the susceptible groups of AIDS, and the reason why there is such a high infection rate in this population is related to many factors. It can not be ignored that it is precisely because of the widespread stigma and discrimination against homosexuality that many comrades are in an extremely negative psychological state. Many studies in psychology and sociology have proved that in such a state of mind and social survival, individuals are easy to ignore their own health. At the same time, due to the lack of social and family support necessary for the development of normal emotional relationships, a large number of comrades can only communicate in a hasty and covert situation. Under such circumstances, it is difficult for sex to be prepared and safe. Discuss "why the gay community AIDS remains high", these reasons can not be ignored. When many people attribute the cause of the AIDS problem in the whole society to comrades, they should reflect on the social root causes of the problem. In fact, there is evidence that attributing AIDS to one or more minorities in society and adopting indifference, discrimination or stigmatization are not only not conducive to the prevention and control of the disease, it itself is the catalyst for the large-scale epidemic of the disease in the mainstream population. For example, AIDS has been prevalent among gay men in the United States throughout. Until 1995, most heterosexual white men in the United States believed that AIDS was a "homosexual disease." that AIDS has nothing to do with being heterosexual. The consequence of the prevalence of this concept has been a gradual increase in the incidence of AIDS among heterosexual American men since the late 1990s.

In addition, many people believe that the "chaotic" sexual relationship among gay men is the root cause of AIDS, and that comrades should be held responsible for this "immoral" cause.

So should "multiple sexual partners" become a moral issue again? This is another topic that should be discussed two times. The findings of sociological and behavioral surveys do support the fact that multiple sexual partners are indeed a more common phenomenon among gay men. However, this is not exclusive to gay men. According to research by Pan Suiming, a professor at Renmin University of China, among the "mainstream" heterosexual groups, the number of people who have multiple sexual partners has also increased rapidly in recent years. As for whether multiple sexual partners themselves should be the negative object of moral judgment, it is necessary to use a basic criterion. Whether international or domestic, most ethicists and sociologists agree that the bottom line of morality should be "no harm to others". If it is a consensual sexual relationship between adults and does not involve emotional and / or relationship harm to a third person, it should be said that under such a premise, whether heterosexual or homosexual, multiple sexual partners should no longer be a moral issue. Of course, from a risk point of view bad dragon dildo , whether of the same sex or the opposite sex, multiple sexual partners will increase the risk of transmission of AIDS and STDs. Therefore, the solution to the problem still translates into how to promote people to raise risk awareness, make good use of protective measures, and avoid infection. On this issue, it needs to be emphasized that the lack of social recognition, the lack of basic legal protection, the pressure from the family, and so on, make it difficult for many comrades to maintain a fixed one-to-one emotional and sexual relationship.

Scientific facts have proved that the number of sexual partners is proportional to the risk of contracting STDs and AIDS. Whether heterosexual or homosexual, having sex with many people will increase the risk of infection. However, in a society with full freedom of choice, individuals have every right to choose whether they have one or more sexual partners as long as they are voluntary and autonomous. What I want to emphasize here is only the fact that the reason why many comrades are unable to maintain a stable relationship is mainly due to social environment and family pressure. On the other hand, if society can be more tolerant, it will provide more AIDS protection not only for homosexuals, but also for others. This is particularly important at a time when many homosexuals in China are eventually forced to marry the opposite sex. Blindly emphasizing that homosexuality is a high-risk group is highly misleading and will make many heterosexuals produce a false sense of security, thinking that they do not belong to a high-risk group so it is safe. However, in fact, due to multiple pressures from social families, many homosexuals are forced to have sex and marry with the opposite sex, making the so-called difference between high-risk and non-high-risk meaningless.

It is faced with challenges similar to AIDS from all aspects of social life, people have to rethink how to get along, how to communicate and cooperate, these thoughts are inevitably related to the foundation of people's lives. Homosexuality and its relationship with AIDS provide an excellent starting point for people's thinking: how we care for, respect and act on each other, and how to create relationship patterns with others in our daily lives. and how to treat people who are different from themselves and their way of life. Hot articles list of Xingfu Garden
Realistic dildo | best vibrator | pvc dildo | fat pocket pussy | Mushroom Head Dildo | Penis Pumps

• Turkish men and women take a bath to choose a bride
• Two-sided life of AIDS patients: fear of being abandoned and hiding in the toilet to take medicine