The contradiction and conflict between Contemporary sexual morality and Marriage

The contradiction and conflict between Contemporary sexual morality and Marriage



What kind of sexual morality is reasonable? Two standards have been recognized, that is, as far as society is concerned, sexual morality must be conducive to maintaining the stability of marriage and the integrity of the family as a social cell; as far as individuals are concerned, sexual morality must be conducive to the satisfaction of people's natural and emotional needs.

The current sexual morality of the Chinese people is based on this standard. Its essence can be summarized as follows: sex can only take place in the sense of marriage, it is the most essential feature that distinguishes husband-wife relationship from any other interpersonal relationship, and all extramarital sex is unreasonable. On the surface, this principle of sexual morality seems to best preserve the sanctity of marriage.

Therefore, although it is facing the increasing impact of "premarital sex" and "extramarital love", the theorists have never doubted its rationality. People prefer to attribute the crisis faced by modern marriage to the loss of sexual morality, but they are not willing to review it from the perspective of sexual morality itself. But the reality often gives us such an embarrassment: it is precisely because of abiding by sexual morality that marriage is led to crisis. This statement may surprise many moralists, but if the author objectively shows the negation of the existing marriage contained in the contemporary sexual morality, many people will not be surprised.

The following shows the conflict between contemporary sexual morality and marriage from five aspects.

1. Contemporary sexual morality objectively reduces the value implication of marriage itself and weakens the social responsibility of both husband and wife.

Sexual morality bases sexual behavior on the basis of marriage and has two direct purposes: one is to grant husband and wife the right to have sex, so that couples can enjoy the pleasure of sex and thus realize the further sublimation of love; the second is to clarify the reproductive obligations of both husband and wife in sexual behavior, so as to promote the reproduction of human beings. It should be said that the purpose pursued by sexual morality is beautiful, but it also sets up obstacles for the realization of this goal at the same time. Because sexual morality deprives unmarried men and women of their right to communicate best vibrator , young people's sexual needs have been denied in fact during the more than a decade from sexual maturity to marriage. Our morality often diverts young people's attention from their work and study, which is a good wish, but it is difficult to come true. Freud has admitted: "only a small number of people can sublimate their sexual power away from the sexual object and engage in more advanced cultural activities." Now it is fashionable to affirm and advocate "moderate masturbation" through the mouth of doctors. Although it relieves the sexual tension of young people to some extent realistic dildo , it does not fundamentally eliminate the sexual depression of young people, and it may also cause physical and psychological harm to young people.

After all, only sexual behavior between members of the opposite sex is in line with human nature. It is precisely because the normal sexual needs of young people are greatly suppressed before marriage that there will be an over-value rebound when they get married. many young men and women only regard marriage as a bridge to realize their own sexual fantasies. the sexual enjoyment of husband and wife is exaggerated as the whole and ultimate goal of marriage, so that sacred marriage is devalued into animal mating of a pair of young men and women who are burning with lust. Because husband and wife only regard each other as sexual partners, not as life partners? Enter your own life, so that tragedies are inevitable. When they married carelessly and gave birth to a baby, they suddenly found that marriage life was not as romantic as they had imagined, and every aspect of family life required them to bear responsibility, and they may have no material foundation or psychological preparation. They have no choice but to break free in the siege of marriage, but most people usually earn it. Because the seriousness of marriage requires them to last as long as possible. In other words, we can see that sexual morality makes the sexual desire in marriage become fanatical by suppressing the sexual demand before marriage huge anal dildo , which weakens the social responsibility of both sides of the marriage and finally leads to the misfortune of marriage.

2. Contemporary sexual morality unconsciously agrees with the traditional concept of chastity, creating a de facto inequality between men and women.

The traditional concept of chastity has always been opposed by contemporary sexual morality, but this opposition has unfortunately become a mere formality. In essence, contemporary sexual morality does not have a realistic impact on the traditional concept of chastity, on the contrary, it unconsciously provides an argument for the traditional view of chastity. According to the requirements of contemporary sexual morality, sex is reasonable only when it takes place as husband and wife between men and women, and all sexual acts before marriage are immoral. The logical conclusion must be that only the marriage of virgin and virgin is moral, in other words, only the marriage of chastity is moral. Some people may think that the author has misinterpreted the morality of modernity, but unfortunately, the whole society has misinterpreted it like me. If a bride is found to be not a virgin by her groom on her wedding night, what will happen to the bride?

Our society recognizes only one solution-proof of the bride's innocence. The most ideal way is to find an authoritative doctor and issue a certificate that "strenuous exercise leads to the rupture of the hymen." in this way, society will be grateful for the bride and the groom will be able to tolerate it. If the bride admits that she has experienced "rape", the society can still show sympathy penispumpe , but the bridegroom will no longer be tolerant; if the bride is confirmed to have a voluntary affair with someone else, she will be beaten up. Society will unanimously denounce it as deserving, and the rest of the bride will probably only be qualified as a prostitute. This is the modern concept of chastity created by our sexual morality, in which the inhumanity is always reminiscent of the cruel feudal ethics. In order to avoid the problem of chastity affecting their marriage, using "artificial hymen" to disguise chastity has become a last resort choice for many girls who have lost their virginity, and sexual morality in turn creates hypocrisy.

Originally, marriage is reasonable as long as it is based on love. As for whether a couple is a virgin or a virgin, it has nothing to do with the nature of marriage. Therefore, no husband has the right to ask whether his wife is a virgin or not. Society should not give this right to be a husband. If a man divorces his wife simply because she is not a virgin, he is not worthy of this woman at all, because he regards a woman's flesh injury as more important than the whole love. Because "chastity" has always been meaningful to women and has no restraint on men, it will inevitably lead to injustice to women objectively. The concept of chastity derived from contemporary sexual morality has been created and will continue to cause the destruction of many beautiful marriages.
Realistic dildo | best vibrator | pvc dildo | fat pocket pussy

• The color of a woman and a good man has existed since ancient times.
• The diary "Zhi Qiumei" of the head nurse for AIDS prevention in Nanchang triggered a heated discussion among netizens.